The Science of ...Oil Tank Pressures

03/18/08

Permalink 05:40:33 pm, by diandra Email , 321 words, 396 views   English (US)
Categories: Announcements [A], Engines, Oil

The Science of ...Oil Tank Pressures

A slight errata:

This doesn’t change anything about the science surrouding the oil tank box cover and how it could provide an aerodynamic advantage, but it does clarify the situation with how the oil system is pressurized. Dan pointed out my error some time ago in the comments section to that blog, but it took me this long to get confirmation and an explanation from someone with enough patience to wade through it with me.

Here’s a flow chart of the engine oil system. I incorrectly stated that the entire oil system was “pressurized", but only part of it is pressurized. The top oil pump (which directs oil to the engine) puts the oil under pressure. The crankcase (bottom of the engine) is at a lower pressure than atmosphere thanks to the bottom oil pump. This makes perfect sense, because how would the oil get back to the oil tank if there wasn’t a pressure differential? The oil tank itself (and the overflow container, which is located in the trunk) are both at atmospheric pressure.

My oil tank expert wishes me to point out that I drew two oil pumps, but that it’s really just one oil pump with multiple stages. The top box represents the pressurizing stage and the bottom pump represents the scavaging stages. The scavenging stages are the ones that He also points out that there are multipe scavenge stages, which are the pump stages that bring the oil back to the oil tank. The problem was that it looked more confusing than helpful when I drew the diagram with a single oil pump.

Thanks to Dan for pointing this out, and for advancing my argument with my husband that the third garage at the new house would make a perfect home for an old stock car. Just so I don’t have to constantly bug people who are trying to get their cars ready for the next race.

Comments, Pingbacks:

Comment from: dan [Visitor] Email
Nice follow up. I apologize for being argumentative. I'm really impressed that you didn't just blow it off. Good luck with you garage acquisition!
PermalinkPermalink 03/19/08 @ 11:47
Comment from: diandra [Member] Email

Hey Dan:


No apologies needed. I appreciate people who feel strongly about getting things right! You obviously have a lot of expertise, so I will count on you to keep me honest in the future.


PermalinkPermalink 03/19/08 @ 18:49

Leave a comment:

Your email address will not be displayed on this site.
Your URL will be displayed.

Allowed XHTML tags: <p, ul, ol, li, dl, dt, dd, address, blockquote, ins, del, span, bdo, br, em, strong, dfn, code, samp, kdb, var, cite, abbr, acronym, q, sub, sup, tt, i, b, big, small>
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Set cookies for name, email and url)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will NOT be displayed.))

Upcoming Appearances

  • November 6: Tempe AZ. Physics Department colloquium on The Physics of NASCAR at Arizona State University. Possible talk for the public
  • November 12: Spartanburg, SC. Spartanburg Science Center talk for the public. 7:00 p.m. in the David Reid Theatre in the Chapman Cultural Center. Free admission. Book signing to follow. More details.
  • November 18: College Park, MD. Physics Department colloquium on The Physics of NASCAR at the University of Maryland.
  • My book, The Physics of NASCAR, got a mention by the author of its forward, Ray Evernham, on ESPN.com. PS: They taught me a whole lot more than I taught them.

Complete list of engagements

Got a question?

E-mail your question. We can't answer all questions, but we'll try to get the most popular ones answered.

XML Feeds

What is RSS?

powered by
b2evolution